← News
Topic · Product

SOL

240 articles · 6+ stories

🔥

Stories about SOL

Solana’s DEX trades overtake NYSE: Is this SOL’s next Q4 catalyst?
🔥 2 sources

Solana’s DEX trades overtake NYSE: Is this SOL’s next Q4 catalyst?

Sep 23, 2026· AMBCrypto
OpenAI and Anthropic launch lower-cost AI models
🔥 5 sources

OpenAI and Anthropic launch lower-cost AI models

OpenAI launched GPT-6 Sol and GPT-6 Luna, while Anthropic unveiled Claude Opus 5.5. The companies introduced the models on the same day, within roughly an hour of each other. OpenAI said its models build on methods used for GPT-6 Astra and offer lower-cost options.

Sep 22, 2026· 9to5Google
Bitcoin Suisse to cut up to 50% of Swiss staff in major restructuring push
🔥 20 sources

Bitcoin Suisse to cut up to 50% of Swiss staff in major restructuring push

Sep 11, 2026· AMBCrypto
Solana expands tokenized equities as SOL tests $102.50 – Can it break higher?
🔥 6 sources

Solana expands tokenized equities as SOL tests $102.50 – Can it break higher?

Sep 14, 2026· 99Bitcoins
SOLUSDT Bullish Breakout – Buy Setup
🔥 1 sources

SOLUSDT Bullish Breakout – Buy Setup

Sep 14, 2026· TradingView Ideas
SOL/USD: EMA55 Rejection Keeps Downtrend Pressing 98.00 Swing Lo
🔥 1 sources

SOL/USD: EMA55 Rejection Keeps Downtrend Pressing 98.00 Swing Lo

Sep 15, 2026· TradingView Ideas
See also
SolanaEthereumBitcoinXRPXRPETFDogecoinHyperliquid
📰

Latest SOL articles

OpenAI's New GPT-6 Sol and Luna Models Bring Astra Improvements to Cheaper Tiers

OpenAI's New GPT-6 Sol and Luna Models Bring Astra Improvements to Cheaper Tiers

OpenAI today launched GPT–6 Sol and GPT–6 Luna, two new models that follow GPT–6 Astra. OpenAI says the new models were developed using methods similar to Astra's for improvements in professional work, factuality, coding, computer use, and alignment. GPT–6 Sol is for everyday work, and it costs less than Astra. GPT–6 Luna is an even cheaper model. Luna is optimized for fast responses and higher volume, while Sol has more reasoning capability. The new models outperform their predecessors on OpenAI's benchmark tests, and GPT–6 Sol makes "about half as many mistakes" as GPT–5.6 Sol. GPT–6 Sol shows improvements in coding and computer use compared to GPT–5.6 Sol, and it matches or beats Claude Fable 5.1 scores on some benchmarks. OpenAI compared GPT–6 Sol to Opus 5 on several tests, but Anthropic released a new Opus 5.5 model today that outperforms Astra on some coding and knowledge work benchmarks. GPT–6 Sol and Luna are adopting the improved communication style OpenAI introduced with Astra for simplified conversations with less jargon and fewer low-value details. Answers should be slightly shorter without losing substance, and the new models have lower rates of misleading claims about their coding work in OpenAI's alignment testing. OpenAI is lowering token prices for Sol and Luna compared to their 5.6 counterparts, and prompt caching has been improved. OpenAI says agents will reuse more context, respond faster, and get 90 percent discounts on cached input-token reads. GPT–6 Sol is priced at $2 per million input tokens and $10 per million output tokens, down by half. GPT–6 Luna costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens, down from $0.20 and $1.20, respectively. GPT–6 Sol costs half as much per token as Opus 5.5, but Anthropic says Opus 5.5 uses fewer tokens per task than Opus 5, so it's not a straight comparison. GPT–6 Sol and GPT–6 Luna are rolling out in ChatGPT Work and Codex starting today for Plus, Pro, Business, Enterprise, and Edu users. GPT–6 Luna is available to Free and Go users in the desktop app. GPT–6 Sol and Luna are not yet available in Chat mode. Tag: OpenAI This article, " OpenAI's New GPT-6 Sol and Luna Models Bring Astra Improvements to Cheaper Tiers " first appeared on MacRumors.com Discuss this article in our forums

AstraLunaOpus 5.5
Sep 22, 2026 · byMacRumors
BASIS.pro Expands On-Chain Infrastructure With XDC Network Partnership and Zypher DAO as Auto Earn Goes Live

BASIS.pro Expands On-Chain Infrastructure With XDC Network Partnership and Zypher DAO as Auto Earn Goes Live

London, United Kingdom, September 17th, 2026, Chainwire. New developments extend BASIS across real-world asset and AI-native infrastructure while introducing automated reward restaking for BTC, ETH, SOL, and PAXG participants BASIS, the institutional-grade crypto yield and staking platform built on market-neutral execution infrastructure, is continuing to expand its institutional footprint with three new developments: an ecosystem […]

BitcoinChainwireEthereum
Sep 17, 2026 · byBitcoin.com News
SOLUSDT Bullish Recovery | Descending Trendline Test (1H).

SOLUSDT Bullish Recovery | Descending Trendline Test (1H).

SOL has staged a recovery from the 96.80–98.90 support zone and is now pushing higher toward the descending trendline. Price is reclaiming the short-term moving-average area, while the trendline around 103.50–104.00 remains the key resistance to overcome. 🟦 Support Zone: 96.80–98.90 🟢 1st Resistance Objective: 104.00–104.20 🟢 2nd Resistance Objective: 108.00–108.20 📈 Bias: Recovery structure, with breakout confirmation required. A sustained move above the descending trendline and 104.00 resistance could strengthen the recovery toward 108.00–108.20. If price fails at the trendline, the 98.90–96.80 area remains the key support region to watch.

SOLSolana
Sep 17, 2026 · byTradingView Ideas
SOL/USD: Bearish BoS at 99.00 Caps Bounce Below EMA55

SOL/USD: Bearish BoS at 99.00 Caps Bounce Below EMA55

SOL's trading at 99.66 after a modest 1% bounce, but the STC picture is still firmly in the sellers' hands. Trend bias reads Downtrend, EMA55 sits overhead at 100.53, and just 9 bars ago price printed a bearish BoS through the 99.00 swing pivot. The bounce has only carried price into the upper half of the volatility band, with band upper at 102.03 acting as the next natural cap. Why it matters: on the 4H, that fresh bearish BoS is the dominant structural event, and the last swing high at 104.82 is still open and untested. Sellers defended EMA55 on the last leg down — until price reclaims that line on a closing basis, every push higher is a supply test, not a trend change. The compressed 1.75 ATR means moves are tight; the band edges frame the next reaction zones cleanly. Trigger to watch: a 4H close back above EMA55 at 100.53 with follow-through toward the band upper — that flips the near-term tone and puts the 104.82 swing high back in play. Failing that, a rejection in the 100.50-102.00 supply pocket keeps the bearish BoS alive and points price back toward the recent low. Invalidation: a clean 4H close above 104.82 takes the bearish structure off the table entirely. Targets: 96.77 — band lower and first magnet on a rejection. 95.82 — last swing low, the line that must hold. 102.03 — band upper on the reclaim scenario. Setup: Watching reaction at EMA55 (100.53) after the fresh bearish BoS through 99.00 — reclaim reopens 104.82, rejection points back to 95.82. Invalidation: A 4H close above the 104.82 swing high invalidates the bearish structure. Targets: 96.77 — band lower, first magnet on rejection · 95.82 — last swing low, structural line in the sand · 102.03 — band upper on an EMA55 reclaim

SOLSolana
Sep 17, 2026 · byTradingView Ideas
SOLUSDT 8H — Rangebreaker CHoCH, Watching the Retest

SOLUSDT 8H — Rangebreaker CHoCH, Watching the Retest

SOL's correction off the 110 high did more than pull back into support, it swept it. C dropped to 96, undercutting the A low at 97.38, then reclaimed back above the range within the same sequence. That's a rangebreaker CHoCH, and it printed with the larger trend, this whole ABC is corrective inside the bigger move up from the ~80 low in August, not a standalone bearish structure. Gate one, structure, still needs the descending trendline from the 110 high broken to fully confirm reversal, that line sits near 102 and hasn't been touched yet. But the character of the correction just shifted. A sweep below range lows followed by a reclaim is exhaustion behavior, not continuation behavior, sellers pushed through the obvious level and couldn't hold it. Gate two, the zone, is the reclaimed range itself, 96-98. This is now the level that needs to hold, not the level being tested for the first time. Gate three, the trigger, already printed on this timeframe, the reclaim above 97.38 after the C sweep is the CHoCH. But the entry isn't this candle. The way this pattern pays is on the retest, once the larger timeframe has shown the tell, weight goes on where a smaller timeframe comes back down to test the reclaimed range and holds it. That's the trade, not the reclaim itself. What makes the R:R on this kind of setup worth taking seriously is the stop sits tight against the range low that just got swept and reclaimed, while the room above runs back to the B high at 107 and the range top near 110. What invalidates it is a retest that fails, price closing back below 96, which would mean the sweep wasn't exhaustion, it was just the range breaking for real. The sweep already did the hard part of showing who was left to sell. The retest just confirms nobody meaningful was.

ABCSOLSolana
Sep 17, 2026 · byTradingView Ideas